Preloader Logo

Extracorporeal Circulation (ECLS/ECMO) for Cardiocirculatory Failure – Summary of the S3 Guideline

KARDIOTECHNIK Ausgabe:
2022/4; 031(1):009-014

Autor:innen

Boeken1, A. Assmann1, A. Beckmann2, Ch. Schmid3, K. Werdan4, G. Michels5, O. Miera6, F. Schmidt7, S. Klotz8, Ch. Starck9, K. Pilarczyk10, A. Rastan11, M. Burckhardt12, M. Nothacker13, R. Muellenbach14, Y. Zausig15, N. Haake10, H. Groesdonk16, M. Ferrari17, M. Buerke18, M. Hennersdorf19, M. Rosenberg20, T. Schaible21, H. Köditz22, S. Kluge23, U. Janssens24, M. Lubnow25, A. Flemmer26, S. Herber-Jonat27, L. Wessel28, D. Buchwald29, S. Maier30, L. Krüger31, A. Fründ32, R. Jaksties33, S. Fischer34, K. Wiebe35, Ch. S. Hartog36, O. Dzemali37, D. Zimpfer38, E. Ruttmann-Ulmer39, Ch. Schlensak40, M. Kelm41, S. Ensminger42   1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University Medical School, Duesseldorf, Germany 2German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Langenbeck-Virchow-Haus, Berlin, Germany 3Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 4Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany 5Department of Acute and Emergency Care, St. Antonius Hospital Eschweiler, Eschweiler, Germany 6Department of Congenital Heart Disease-Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany 7Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany 8Department of Cardiac Surgery, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany 9Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Centre, Berlin, Germany 10Department for Intensive Care Medicine, Imland Hospital Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany 11Department of Cardiac and Vascular Thoracic Surgery, Philipps-University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany 12Department of Health Sciences and Management, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DHBW), Stuttgart, Germany 13Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany 14Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Campus Kassel of the University of Southampton, Kassel, Germany 15Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine,Aschaffenburg-Alzenau Hospital, Aschaffenburg, Bavaria, Germany 16Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Helios Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany 17HSK, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Helios-Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany 18Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Marienkrankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany 19Department of Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany 20Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany 21Department of Neonatology, University Children’s Hospital Mannheim,University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany 22Medical University Children’s Hospital, Hannover, Germany 23Klinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland 24Medical Clinic and Medical Intensive Care Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany 25Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany 26Division of Neonatology, Dr. v. Hauner Children’s Hospital and Perinatal Center Munich-Grosshadern, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany 27Division of Neonatology, Dr. v. Hauner Children’s Hospital and Perinatal Center Munich-Grosshadern, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany 28Department of Pediatric Surgery,Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany 29Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany 30Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany 31Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart- and Diabetes Centre NRW, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany 32Department of Physiotherapy, Heart- and Diabetes Centre NRW, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany 33German Heart Foundation 34Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Support, Ibbenbueren General Hospital, Ibbenbueren, Germany 35Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany 36Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and Klinik Bavaria, Kreischa, Germany 37Department of Cardiac Surgery, Triemli City Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland 38Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 39Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria 40Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany 41Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University Medical School, Duesseldorf, Germany 42Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany

Zusammen­fassung

Seit einigen Jahren ist eine stetige Zunahme des Einsatzes von mechanischen  extrakorporalen Herz­Kreislauf­ und Lungenunterstützungssystemen (ECLS/ECMO) zu verzeichnen. So wurden seit 2015 in Deutschland jährlich bei etwa 3000 Patienten ECLS/ECMO­Systeme implantiert. Trotz dieser häufigen Anwendung der passageren   Unterstützungssysteme existieren zurzeit national und international nur Leitlinien zum Einsatz der ECMO/ECLS, bei denen es um erkrankungsbezogene Teilaspekte komplexer Therapiekaskaden geht. Vor diesem Hintergrund mangelt es immer noch an evidenzbasierten Empfehlungen zur ECLS/ECMO­Therapie im Hinblick auf Indikationen und das komplexe Patientenmanagement [1]. Aus diesem Grund erfolgte im Juli  2015 durch die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Thorax­, Herz­ und Gefäßchirurgie (DGTHG) die Anmeldung einer diesbezüglichen S3­Leitlinie bei der zuständigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V. (AWMF). Im Mittelpunkt der Leitlinie steht die klinische Anwendung der ECLS/ ECMO­Therapie; ergänzend werden auch strukturelle und ökonomische Aspekte angesprochen. Unter Federführung der DGTHG wurde mit Einbindung von Experten aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, delegiert aus 11 AWMF­Fachgesellschaften, 5 weiteren Fachgesellschaften sowie der Patientenvertretung, die S3­Leitlinie im Februar 2021 publiziert. Dieser Artikel stellt eine kurze Zusammenfassung des methodischen Konzepts sowie aller konsentierten Empfehlungen für jede bearbeitete Fragestellung der Leitlinie dar.

Keywords

Guideline, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, extracorporeal life support, heart failure, lung failure

These guidelines were a first publication in Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021;69:483–489.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Rüdigerstraße 14
70469 Stuttgart, Germany DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735464. ISSN 0171-6425


Udo Boeken, MD,
Department of Cardiac Surgery,
Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty Moorenstrasse 5
40225 Duesseldorf, Germany E-Mail:




INTRODUCTION

In Germany, a remarkable increase in the usage of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems has been observed in recent years, with approximately 3,000 annual ECLS/ECMO implantations since 2015. Despite the widespread use of ECLS/ECMO, there is still lack of evidence­based recommendations and guidelines, particularly associated with indications, contraindications, limitations, and management [1]. Therefore, in 2015 the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS, DGTHG) registered the multidisciplinary S3 guideline “use of extracorporeal circulation life support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECLS/ECMO) for cardiac and circulatory failure” to create recommendations for ECMO/ECLS systems according to the requirements of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and the Medical Centre for  Quality (Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität, ÄZQ). Although the clinical application of  ECMO/ECLS represents the main focus, the guideline also addresses structural and economic issues and was completed in February 2021. This report presents a summary of the methodological concept and accepted recommendations of this guideline.

METHODS

Altogether, six consensus conferences with delegates of all participating societies took place between 2016 and 2020. All conferences were moderated by a representative of the AWMF. Further details are explained in the official guideline report [2].

The most important task of the presented guideline is the implementation of evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for patients requiring ECLS due to cardiocirculatory failure.

Target audience for these recommendations are all clinicians involved in the clinical care of patients with acute cardiac and circulatory failure, particularly within the areas of cardiac surgery, cardiology, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, pulmonology, trauma surgery, and pediatrics. Additionally, it was intended to focus on aspects relevant for clinicians in rehabilitation centers, physiotherapists, paramedics and nursing staff, as well as patients and their relatives.

With the primary literature search we analyzed all relevant publications between 2010 and 2018 (n=9.801).

However, only 68 articles (four secondary studies, 37 primary studies addressing efficacy, and 27 registry studies including >1,000 patients) were of sufficient quality for final inclusion after thorough analysis [2]. The levels of evidence (see table 1) for the different aspects of ECLS therapy were systematically assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) criteria [3].

Given these evidence levels, the final recommendations were consented and classified (see table 2) according to the GRADE criteria [4].



RESULTS

General Comments

Consensus was reached on 71 recommendations for ECLS therapy in acute cardiac and circulatory failure. Details regarding background literature for all recommendations as well as explanations for the grading of recommendations and the levels of evidence are described in the separate supplement. Therefore, in this short summary we only present tables with the formulated recommendations of each chapter.

Table 1: Levels of evidence

Note: Definition of the levels of evidence referring to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) standards [2].

Table 2: Grades of recommendation

Note: Definition of the grades of recommendation referring to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) standards [3].


Indications and contraindications

Table 3: Recommendations: indications and contraindications


Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.


Structural and personnel requirements

Table 4: Recommendations: structural and personnel requirements

Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.


Therapy management and monitoring

Table 5: Recommendations: therapy management and monitoring

Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.


Complication management

Table 6: Recommendations: complication management

Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.


Weaning

Table 7: Recommendations: weaning

Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.


Aftercare

Table 8: Recommendations: aftercare

Abbreviations: ECLS, extracorporeal life support; Grade, grade of recommendation (see table 1); level, level of evidence.



ECLS THERAPY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

This section includes the same number of recommendations as the entire adult section; therefore, we refer here to the supplement with a complete list of all pediatric recommendations.



DISCUSSION

In an interdisciplinary approach the participating societies and involved organizations established the first evidence and consensus guideline on ECLS therapy for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland according to AWMF and GRADE criteria. With this summary, we want to provide a brief overview of the methodological concept as well as the consented recommendations of this guideline.

The majority of recommendations have been approved by expert consensus due to the fact that high-level evidence is currently not available. Therefore, the urgent need for further research on all aspects of ECLS therapy is clearly evident. However, the generation of high-level evidence within a reasonable time period appears to be an intractable challenge. Low center volume and randomization difficulties in acute cardiac failure may impair the successful completion and implementation of viable studies analyzing all relevant ECLS topics. With the help of our guideline a critical appraisal of the current studies on this topic will be facilitated and it becomes obvious that high-evidence-level studies are still missing. Therefore, future research on ECMO/ECLS in collaborative efforts must be undertaken and strongly supported.



VALIDITY AND UPDATE

All presented guideline recommendations are based on the best scientific evidence currently available for ECLS therapy. The mandate holders of all participating societies as well as all boards of the scientific associations approved the entirety of recommendations, which are valid up to August 2025.

The long and short versions of the guideline including all background information are available in German language [1].

FUNDING

The preparation of this guideline was funded by institutional grants of the German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS, DGTHG) Berlin, Germany.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Literatur

1. Assmann A, Boeken U, Klotz S, Harringer W, Beckmann A. Organization and application of ECLS therapy—a nationwide survey in German Cardiosurgical Departments. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;67(03):164–169. 2. Extrakorporale Zirkulation (ECLS/ECMO), Einsatz bei Herz- und Kreislaufversagen. S3-Leitlinie. AWMF-RN 011–021; 2020. Available at: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/ detail/ll/011-021.html. 3. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(04):401–406. 4. Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66(07):719–725.

Willkommen zur neuen Webseite

Nach über einem ¾ Jahr der Planung, intensiven Meetings, Codierung und Schreibarbeit ist am 13.01.2025 ist unsere neue Website live gegangen und wir sind stolz, hier ein neues Zuhause für unsere Mitglieder geschaffen zu haben. Zukünftig soll sie zur zentralen Plattform des Austauschs in unserer Community werden. Dafür arbeiten wir im Hintergrund an spannenden Erweiterungen.

Ein Highlight wird ein eigener „News“-Bereich sein, der euch stets über aktuelle Entwicklungen rund um Perfusion und technische Medizin informiert. Schaut regelmäßig vorbei und bringt euch ein – wir freuen uns auf eure Anregungen!

54. Internationale Jahrestagung der DGPTM und 17. Fokustagung Herz der DGTHG und DGPTM

Sachkunde ECLS Mai 2025

Als Mitglied der DGPTM können Sie sich mit der bei uns hinterlegten Mailadresse oder Ihrem Benutzernamen ganz einfach mit einem Einmalpasswort einloggen. Dieses bekommen Sie per Mail geschickt. Sie werden danach direkt in den Internen Bereich geleitet.

Achtung: Mehrfache Anforderungen beschleunigen die Mailzustellung nicht.
Ihr Benutzername besteht aus den ersten beiden Buchstaben Ihres Vornamens und Ihrem Nachname (ä=ae ect).